• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • About Craft Brewing Business

Craft Brewing Business

Professional Insight, Unfiltered

Craft Brewing Business Craft Brewing Business
  • News
  • Business & Marketing
  • Packaging & Distribution
  • Equipment & Systems
  • Ingredients & Supplies
  • Webinars & White Papers
  • News
  • Business & Marketing
  • Ingredients & Supplies
  • Packaging & Distribution
  • Equipment
  • Webinars & White Papers
  • COVID-19

Commentary: Recent craft beer trademark battles show importance of IP diligence

February 26, 2018Aaron Wais

trademark intellectual property brewery protection
I know you are, but what am I?

Every brewery has a story to tell, and often that story is reflected through the trademarked names and logos it chooses for itself and its beers. Over time these trademarks come to immediately impart information to consumers about the brewery’s reputation and its product quality. For these reasons, choosing a trademark is of paramount importance.

Several recent cases, however, highlight that there is more to choosing a name than meets the eye. From cities to deceased famous musicians, breweries have found themselves in unexpected fights over the names they have chosen for themselves and their beer.

For example, given the importance of community, it is not uncommon for a brewery to use names and images from their surrounding neighborhood. This can lead to issues, however, as seen through the dispute between Old Town Brewing and its hometown of Portland. Old Town Brewing applied for and received a trademark for a leaping stag in the category of beer. The stag, not coincidentally, came from an iconic sign hanging in the Old Town section of Portland. Portland itself held many trademarks to the stag in other categories. The two co-existed peacefully for years until the city decided it wanted to license the stag to a large international beer conglomerate. Thus started a protracted battle over the mark in which Old Town first prevailed in the courts and just recently settled. Of course, while the brewery ultimately prevailed, it presumably spent a lot of money to do so.

It is also common for breweries to name and market a beer in a way that plays on the name of a celebrity (not to mention films, movies and other intellectual property). The recent lawsuit brought by Thelonious Monk’s son against North Coast Brewing reveals the hidden danger in this approach.

North Coast has long brewed an ale in the Trappist style called “Brother Thelonious Belgian Style Abbey Ale.” The ale’s label and packing prominently feature the name, image and likeness of Thelonious Monk, a famous jazz musician. While North Coast believed it had the right to use Monk’s name, the son disagreed. And even though Monk’s son did not hold a trademark in Monk’s name, this did not keep him from suing the brewery for false endorsement, as well as for violating Monk’s rights of publicity. The son’s claims recently survived a motion to dismiss, meaning that the dispute will continue to make its way through the courts for some time.

Old Elk Distillery
Old Elk Distillery

Finally, while it does not involve beer, a case in the spirits world shows the dangers of using seemingly benign imagery in labels and advertising. Recently, a Kentucky distillery, Rabbit Hole Spirits, sued a Colorado distillery, Old Elk Distillery. In addition to its name, Rabbit Hole also uses a trademarked image of a jumping rabbit to sell its bourbons. In its lawsuit, Rabbit Hole accuses Old Elk of using its “jumping rabbit design mark” to “sell distilled spirits to consumers,” namely a “bourbon cream product.”

From the Complaint, confusion seems likely – after all, both companies are selling bourbon products using the same “rabbit jumping mark.” When one views the bottles, however, the result becomes much less certain. First, Old Elk is selling its bourbon cream product under the brand name “Nooku.” Second, the two rabbits are dissimilar in appearance. Each has a distinctive look: the Rabbit Hole rabbit is sleek and is jumping down into a hole (hence evoking the distillery’s name), whereas the Old Elk rabbit has a more retro-feel, is jumping straight and has a flowing ribbon. Of course, regardless of the outcome, Old Elk appears to be in for a long fight.

Rabbit hole spiritsThese are only a few of the many traps for the unwary. Clearing a mark prior to use is vital to avoid litigation and the danger of losing the trademark altogether, along with the goodwill that the brewery has spent time and money building up in the mark. Indeed, given the importance of marketing to the success of a brewery, a brewery should devote as much time and attention to minimizing the risks in its name, beer names and labels as it does to brewing quality beer.

Here’s some additional CBB content on how to protect your brewery:

  • The secret sauce: Protecting brewing recipes and processes (the role of intellectual property)
  • Copy cats: Learn how to avoid those not-so-obvious beer brand trademarks
  • How to defend your craft beer trademarks
  • Craft beer trademarks: Likelihood of confusion

    This commentary was sent in by Aaron Wais, co-chair of MSK’s Alcohol Beverage Industry group, as well as its Entertainment & IP Litigation Group. He has extensive experience providing pragmatic legal advice to companies across a range of industries on a variety of legal issues that also impact the alcohol beverage industry, including trademark, false advertising, misappropriation of publicity rights, FTC compliance and data privacy and security. You can reach him at [email protected].

trademark-craft-beer
Hazy IP: Understanding patents and trademarks through hops
Intellectual property advice for craft breweries
Collabapalooza
Accountant advice for brewing and marketing a profitable (and legal) collaboration beer
guns n roses
Clever joke or pun-intentional lawsuit? Let’s talk craft beer names and trademark infringement

Reader Interactions

Trackbacks

  1. The Problem with the Pinkertons – joshuakitchens.com says:
    January 16, 2019 at 4:05 pm

    […] Trademark law gives companies a lot of power to protest the use of words, often very common words (See Beer Trademarks) […]

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

  • Michigan’s Dog Star Hops wins Chinook Cup for second year in a row
  • Beer Institute releases December 2022 domestic tax paid estimate
  • Crooked Hammock combines curling and stouts for cool mini fest
  • Sin, Repent and Repeat on Fat Tuesday and more beers to know this week

Sign up for our newsletter

unsubscribe from list

Most Popular Today

Recent Features

  • Michigan’s Dog Star Hops wins Chinook Cup for second year in a row
    February 1, 2023
  • fort point both-ciders-3Fort Point Beer debuts cider line, explains why ciders instead of seltzers
    January 31, 2023
  • Watch a drone release insects over hop yards for sustainable pest control in this Yakima Chief Hops video series
    January 30, 2023
  • Distro update: Connecticut’s Two Roads Brewing goes to Colorado + news from Surreal, New Sarum and more
    January 30, 2023
  • Cadaverine: When your beer smells like dead human
    January 26, 2023
  • beer taps brain distribution cbb cropUnfiltered: There are weevils in my grain – what do I do?
    January 26, 2023

Footer

  • Email Newsletter Sign Up
  • About Craft Brewing Business
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise on Craft Brewing Business
  • Media Kit Download
  • Privacy and Terms

© 2023 · CBB Media LLC